1. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations, and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information, go to www.intel.com/performance.
2. Claim based on calculated theoretical peak double precision performance capability for a single coprocessor. 16 DP FLOPS/clock/core * 61 cores * 1.238 GHz = 1.208 TeraFLOPS.
3. Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance.
4. Calculated theoretical peak double precision FLOPS (2 x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2697v2 (12 core, 2.7 GHz) vs. 1 x Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor 7120P (61 core, 1.238 GHz) (518 GF/s vs. 1208 GF/s)
5. 2 socket Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2697v2 server vs. a single Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor 5120D (Intel measured DGEMM perf/watt score 548 GF/s @ 451W vs. 837 GF/s @ 225W)
6. 2 socket Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2600 product family server vs. Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor (7.04x: Measured by Intel December 2013. 2 socket E5-2697v2 (12 core, 2.7GHz) vs. 1 Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor 7120P (61 cores, 1.238GHz) on a Single Precision Monte Carlo Simulation. 78.444 Koptions/sec vs. 552.41 Koptions/sec )